Neurology/perception - Revision history

86.166.231.251: /* Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans */

2011-09-15T10:56:36Z

Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 15 September 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>		Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>
	Jaime A Pineda<br>[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]<br><br>		Jaime A Pineda<br>[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]<br><br>
	C. Catmur<br>[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Contingency Is Crucial for Creating Imitative Responses]<br><br>		Caroline Catmur<br>[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Contingency Is Crucial for Creating Imitative Responses]<br><br>
	Fortunato Battaglia, Sarah H. Lisanby and David Freedberg<br>[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Corticomotor Excitability During Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art]<br><br>		Fortunato Battaglia, Sarah H. Lisanby and David Freedberg<br>[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Corticomotor Excitability During Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art]<br><br>
	Michele Rucci and Gaëlle Desbordes<br>[http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/11/18.full Contributions of Fixational Eye Movements to the Discrimination of Briefly Presented Stimuli]		Michele Rucci and Gaëlle Desbordes<br>[http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/11/18.full Contributions of Fixational Eye Movements to the Discrimination of Briefly Presented Stimuli]

86.166.231.251: /* Nervous Perception: Germinal Articles in Neuroscience on Sensorimotor Experience */

2011-09-15T10:54:49Z

Nervous Perception: Germinal Articles in Neuroscience on Sensorimotor Experience

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:54, 15 September 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>		J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>

	== '''Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans''' ==<br><br>		== '''Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans'''<br><br> ==
	Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>		Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>
	Jaime A Pineda<br>[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]<br><br>		Jaime A Pineda<br>[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]<br><br>

86.166.231.251: /* Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans */

2011-09-15T10:53:41Z

Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 15 September 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>		J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>

	== '''Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans''' ==		== '''Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans''' ==<br><br>
	<br><br>
	Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>		Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>
	Jaime A Pineda<br>[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]<br><br>		Jaime A Pineda<br>[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]<br><br>

86.166.231.251: /* Studies and Commentaries on Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans */

2011-09-15T10:53:20Z

Studies and Commentaries on Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 15 September 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>		J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>

	== '''~~Studies and Commentaries on~~ Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans''' ==		== '''Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans''' ==
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>		Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>

86.166.231.251: /* Nervous perception: germinal articles in neuroscience on sensorimotor experience */

2011-09-15T10:52:47Z

Nervous perception: germinal articles in neuroscience on sensorimotor experience

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 15 September 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	For the last few years, all things ‘neuro’ have been doing the rounds in the creative arts and humanities. We have had the declensions ‘neuropolitics’ and ‘noopolitics’; we have panicked about screen media and the internet rewiring our plastic brains; we have marvelled at artists incorporating MRIs into videos, photomedia and installations. Little wonder at such a response – after all, weren’t the 1990s officially declared, by [http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html US Presidential proclamation] to be the ‘Decade of the Brain’? Neuroscience – the collective nomenclature we give the sciences of the brain  – is in fact a disparate assemblage of disciplines, methods and practices for understanding, healing, transposing, interpreting, imaging and, most importantly, constituting the nervous system in organisms. To get a sense of how diverse these sciences are, we can simply draw a small list up of some of them: for example, neuroanatomy, behavioural neuroscience, computational neuroscience, neuroethnology, molecular neuroscience, systems neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, and so on. These all designate various specialities within neuroscience but also, sometimes vastly different methods, philosophical approaches and indeed ways of realising the brain as organ, system, structure or entity. Within or across any of these specialities, competing and dissonant approaches to how the nervous system is seen to function exist. A decade, indeed more than a century, of practice and research in neuroscience has only multiplied the neural as a vast field of unknown quanta and qualia. [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction (more...)]		For the last few years, all things ‘neuro’ have been doing the rounds in the creative arts and humanities. We have had the declensions ‘neuropolitics’ and ‘noopolitics’; we have panicked about screen media and the internet rewiring our plastic brains; we have marvelled at artists incorporating MRIs into videos, photomedia and installations. Little wonder at such a response – after all, weren’t the 1990s officially declared, by [http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html US Presidential proclamation] to be the ‘Decade of the Brain’? Neuroscience – the collective nomenclature we give the sciences of the brain  – is in fact a disparate assemblage of disciplines, methods and practices for understanding, healing, transposing, interpreting, imaging and, most importantly, constituting the nervous system in organisms. To get a sense of how diverse these sciences are, we can simply draw a small list up of some of them: for example, neuroanatomy, behavioural neuroscience, computational neuroscience, neuroethnology, molecular neuroscience, systems neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, and so on. These all designate various specialities within neuroscience but also, sometimes vastly different methods, philosophical approaches and indeed ways of realising the brain as organ, system, structure or entity. Within or across any of these specialities, competing and dissonant approaches to how the nervous system is seen to function exist. A decade, indeed more than a century, of practice and research in neuroscience has only multiplied the neural as a vast field of unknown quanta and qualia. [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction (more...)]
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	== '''Nervous ~~perception~~: ~~germinal articles~~ in ~~neuroscience~~ on ~~sensorimotor experience~~'''<br><br> ==		== '''Nervous Perception: Germinal Articles in Neuroscience on Sensorimotor Experience'''<br><br> ==

	J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>		J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>

86.166.231.251: /* Studies and commentaries on aspects of sensorimotor experience in the perceptual systems of humans and nonhumans */

2011-09-15T10:52:11Z

Studies and commentaries on aspects of sensorimotor experience in the perceptual systems of humans and nonhumans

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 15 September 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>		J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>

	== '''Studies and ~~commentaries~~ on ~~aspects~~ of ~~sensorimotor experience~~ in the ~~perceptual systems~~ of ~~humans~~ and ~~nonhumans~~''' ==		== '''Studies and Commentaries on Aspects of Sensorimotor Experience in the Perceptual Systems of Humans and Nonhumans''' ==
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>		Nachum Ulanovsky and Cynthia F. Moss<br>[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]<br><br>
	[http://www.pnas.org/content/105/25/8491.full What the Bat's Voice Tells the Bat's Brain]		Jaime A Pineda<br>[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]<br><br>
	<br><br>		C. Catmur<br>[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Contingency Is Crucial for Creating Imitative Responses]<br><br>
	Jaime A Pineda<br>		Fortunato Battaglia, Sarah H. Lisanby and David Freedberg<br>[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Corticomotor Excitability During Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art]<br><br>
	[http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/47 Sensorimotor Cortex As a Critical Component of an 'Extended' Mirror Neuron System: Does It Solve the Sevelopment, Correspondence, and Control Problems in Mirroring?]		Michele Rucci and Gaëlle Desbordes<br>[http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/11/18.full Contributions of Fixational Eye Movements to the Discrimination of Briefly Presented Stimuli]
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	~~C. Catmur<br>~~
	~~[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Contingency Is Crucial for Creating Imitative Responses]~~
	~~<br><br>~~
	~~Fortunato Battaglia, Sarah H. Lisanby and David Freedberg<br>~~
	~~[http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00015/full Corticomotor Excitability During Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art]~~
	~~<br><br>~~
	~~Michele Rucci and Gaëlle Desbordes<br>~~
	~~[http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/11/18.full Contributions of Fixational Eye Movements to the Discrimination of Briefly Presented Stimuli]~~
	~~<br><br>~~
	== '''Online resources about perception and sensorimotor experience from neuroscientfic, philosophical and creative practices'''<br> ==		== '''Online resources about perception and sensorimotor experience from neuroscientfic, philosophical and creative practices'''<br> ==
	<br><br>		<br><br>

86.166.231.251: /* Nervous perception: germinal articles in neuroscience on sensorimotor experience */

2011-09-15T10:49:56Z

Nervous perception: germinal articles in neuroscience on sensorimotor experience

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:49, 15 September 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	For the last few years, all things ‘neuro’ have been doing the rounds in the creative arts and humanities. We have had the declensions ‘neuropolitics’ and ‘noopolitics’; we have panicked about screen media and the internet rewiring our plastic brains; we have marvelled at artists incorporating MRIs into videos, photomedia and installations. Little wonder at such a response – after all, weren’t the 1990s officially declared, by [http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html US Presidential proclamation] to be the ‘Decade of the Brain’? Neuroscience – the collective nomenclature we give the sciences of the brain  – is in fact a disparate assemblage of disciplines, methods and practices for understanding, healing, transposing, interpreting, imaging and, most importantly, constituting the nervous system in organisms. To get a sense of how diverse these sciences are, we can simply draw a small list up of some of them: for example, neuroanatomy, behavioural neuroscience, computational neuroscience, neuroethnology, molecular neuroscience, systems neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, and so on. These all designate various specialities within neuroscience but also, sometimes vastly different methods, philosophical approaches and indeed ways of realising the brain as organ, system, structure or entity. Within or across any of these specialities, competing and dissonant approaches to how the nervous system is seen to function exist. A decade, indeed more than a century, of practice and research in neuroscience has only multiplied the neural as a vast field of unknown quanta and qualia. [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction (more...)]		For the last few years, all things ‘neuro’ have been doing the rounds in the creative arts and humanities. We have had the declensions ‘neuropolitics’ and ‘noopolitics’; we have panicked about screen media and the internet rewiring our plastic brains; we have marvelled at artists incorporating MRIs into videos, photomedia and installations. Little wonder at such a response – after all, weren’t the 1990s officially declared, by [http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html US Presidential proclamation] to be the ‘Decade of the Brain’? Neuroscience – the collective nomenclature we give the sciences of the brain  – is in fact a disparate assemblage of disciplines, methods and practices for understanding, healing, transposing, interpreting, imaging and, most importantly, constituting the nervous system in organisms. To get a sense of how diverse these sciences are, we can simply draw a small list up of some of them: for example, neuroanatomy, behavioural neuroscience, computational neuroscience, neuroethnology, molecular neuroscience, systems neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, and so on. These all designate various specialities within neuroscience but also, sometimes vastly different methods, philosophical approaches and indeed ways of realising the brain as organ, system, structure or entity. Within or across any of these specialities, competing and dissonant approaches to how the nervous system is seen to function exist. A decade, indeed more than a century, of practice and research in neuroscience has only multiplied the neural as a vast field of unknown quanta and qualia. [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction (more...)]
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	== '''Nervous perception: germinal articles in neuroscience on sensorimotor experience'''<br> ==		== '''Nervous perception: germinal articles in neuroscience on sensorimotor experience'''<br><br> ==

	J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>		J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers <br> [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>

	== '''Studies and commentaries on aspects of sensorimotor experience in the perceptual systems of humans and nonhumans''' ==		== '''Studies and commentaries on aspects of sensorimotor experience in the perceptual systems of humans and nonhumans''' ==

86.166.231.251 at 10:49, 15 September 2011

2011-09-15T10:49:10Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 <br><br>
 == '''Nervous perception: germinal articles in neuroscience on sensorimotor experience'''<br>  ==
-<br><br>
-J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br>
+J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. S. McCulloch, and W. H. Pitts<br> [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience] <br><br> Evan Thompson<br> [http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/Articles.htm Colour Vision, Evolution, and Perceptual Content], <br><br> Alva Noë<br> [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~noe/an_articles.html Experience Without the Head] <br><br> Vittorio Gallese and Christian Keysers [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Gallese/ Mirror Neurons: A Sensorimotor Representation System] <br><br> Susan Martinez-Conde, Stephen L. Macknik and David H. Hubel<br> [http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/publications.htm The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception] <br><br>
 [http://jerry.lettvin.com/Jerry/wiki/index.php/Papers What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain]
 == '''Studies and commentaries on aspects of sensorimotor experience in the perceptual systems of humans and nonhumans''' ==
 <br><br>

Joanna at 15:41, 6 September 2011

2011-09-06T15:41:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 6 September 2011
Line 54:		Line 54:
	[http://macknik.neuralcorrelate.com/node/6 Visual Illusions]		[http://macknik.neuralcorrelate.com/node/6 Visual Illusions]
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	<youtube>dmwm8tFnmNk</youtube>		<youtube>dmwm8tFnmNk</youtube><br>
			Garrison Institute Interview with Evan Thompson on the contribution of contribution of phenomenologies of experience to the neuroscience of perception
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	[http://www.neuroculture.org/ Neuroculture.org: examples of work at the intersection of art and neuroscience]		[http://www.neuroculture.org/ Neuroculture.org: examples of work at the intersection of art and neuroscience]
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	[http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Attributions Attributions]		[http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Attributions Attributions]

Joanna at 15:40, 6 September 2011

2011-09-06T15:40:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 6 September 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	= edited by Anna Munster =		= edited by Anna Munster =

	~~<br>~~

	~~Anna Munster~~

	== [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction '''Introduction: Neuro-perception and What's at Stake in Giving Neurology Its Nerves?'''] ==		== [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction '''Introduction: Neuro-perception and What's at Stake in Giving Neurology Its Nerves?'''] ==
	~~<br>~~<br>		<br>
	For the last few years, all things ‘neuro’ have been doing the rounds in the creative arts and humanities. We have had the declensions ‘neuropolitics’ and ‘noopolitics’; we have panicked about screen media and the internet rewiring our plastic brains; we have marvelled at artists incorporating MRIs into videos, photomedia and installations. Little wonder at such a response – after all, weren’t the 1990s officially declared, by [http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html US Presidential proclamation] to be the ‘Decade of the Brain’? Neuroscience – the collective nomenclature we give the sciences of the brain  – is in fact a disparate assemblage of disciplines, methods and practices for understanding, healing, transposing, interpreting, imaging and, most importantly, constituting the nervous system in organisms. To get a sense of how diverse these sciences are, we can simply draw a small list up of some of them: for example, neuroanatomy, behavioural neuroscience, computational neuroscience, neuroethnology, molecular neuroscience, systems neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, and so on. These all designate various specialities within neuroscience but also, sometimes vastly different methods, philosophical approaches and indeed ways of realising the brain as organ, system, structure or entity. Within or across any of these specialities, competing and dissonant approaches to how the nervous system is seen to function exist. A decade, indeed more than a century, of practice and research in neuroscience has only multiplied the neural as a vast field of unknown quanta and qualia. [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction (more...)]		For the last few years, all things ‘neuro’ have been doing the rounds in the creative arts and humanities. We have had the declensions ‘neuropolitics’ and ‘noopolitics’; we have panicked about screen media and the internet rewiring our plastic brains; we have marvelled at artists incorporating MRIs into videos, photomedia and installations. Little wonder at such a response – after all, weren’t the 1990s officially declared, by [http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html US Presidential proclamation] to be the ‘Decade of the Brain’? Neuroscience – the collective nomenclature we give the sciences of the brain  – is in fact a disparate assemblage of disciplines, methods and practices for understanding, healing, transposing, interpreting, imaging and, most importantly, constituting the nervous system in organisms. To get a sense of how diverse these sciences are, we can simply draw a small list up of some of them: for example, neuroanatomy, behavioural neuroscience, computational neuroscience, neuroethnology, molecular neuroscience, systems neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, and so on. These all designate various specialities within neuroscience but also, sometimes vastly different methods, philosophical approaches and indeed ways of realising the brain as organ, system, structure or entity. Within or across any of these specialities, competing and dissonant approaches to how the nervous system is seen to function exist. A decade, indeed more than a century, of practice and research in neuroscience has only multiplied the neural as a vast field of unknown quanta and qualia. [http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org/books/Neurology/Introduction (more...)]
	<br><br>		<br><br>